1. Idea & Creativity

• How well does the project address the mentor-provided challenge and the problem it describes?
• Is the chosen approach clear, original, and creative within the context of that challenge?
• Strong projects clearly demonstrate a deep understanding of the given problem and introduce novel or imaginative elements that make the solution stand out, while still remaining relevant to the mentor’s challenge.

2. Implementation & Functionality

• How well does the solution actually work?
• The prototype should be reliable and functional, with core features fully implemented in line with the challenge requirements. - Judges will evaluate technical skill, stability, and how effectively challenges were solved during development.

3. Usability & Design

• Is the solution easy and pleasant to use?
• Projects should offer a clean, intuitive, and visually consistent interface.
• The user experience should be well thought out, accessible, and suited to the intended audience defined by the challenge.

4. Presentation (Pitch)

• How clearly and convincingly is the idea communicated?
• Teams should present their solution with clarity and confidence, explaining how they approached the mentor-provided challenge, what they built, and why it works.
• A logical structure and engaging delivery are key.

5. Impact & Relevance

• Why does this project matter in the context of the challenge?
• Teams should clearly identify the target audience specified or implied by the challenge and demonstrate the solution’s relevance and value.
• Strong entries show real potential to make an impact by addressing the challenge goals—improving decisions, workflows, efficiency, or outcomes.

Each criterion is scored individually (1–5) by each judge member, and the total score determines the final ranking.